The eye as a replicating and diverging, modular developmental unit

Sparked by new discoveries in developmental genetics, few topics have generated as much debate as eye evolution. This is somewhat surprising because the central controversy is not unique to eyes, but is a general theme of developmental genetics: evolutionarily conserved genes are deployed during the development of highly divergent morphological features. In the case of eyes, this paradox has engendered opposing camps entrenched in what has been termed a ‘scientific war’. One camp highlights conserved genetic features, concluding that eyes stem from an ancestral prototype. The opposing camp emphasizes variation, arguing that some eyes must have recruited the same genes after separate morphological origins. Here, I blur the line between these camps and suggest that eyes have often evolved by replication, perhaps through the ectopic expression of a conserved, modular regulatory cascade to produce serially homologous structures that often diverged during evolution. Therefore, morphologically diverse eyes could stem from a single ancestral prototype, yet also result from multiple morphological origins.